From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 24 13:35:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB5016A4CE for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8889143D58 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pdseniura@techie.com) Received: from wfilter.us4.outblaze.com (wfilter.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.180])116CF1801192 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 20:35:48 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.178) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 24 May 2004 20:35:22 -0000 Received: by ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 939D379004A; Mon, 24 May 2004 20:35:47 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) Received: from [192.149.244.9] by ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com with http for pdseniura@techie.com; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:35:47 -0600 From: "P.D. Seniura" To: "Alex Dupre" Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:35:47 -0600 X-Originating-Ip: 192.149.244.9 X-Originating-Server: ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20040524203547.939D379004A@ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lang/ezm3 "runtime error: Segmentation violation..." X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 20:35:50 -0000 Hi, ----- Original Message ----- From: Alex Dupre Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 19:00:30 +0200 To: Paul Seniura Subject: Re: lang/ezm3 "runtime error: Segmentation violation..." > Paul Seniura wrote: > > I'm including a snip of my portupgrade log for lang/ezm3 below. > > I can't get past this point. Could someone offer ideas, please? > > Same problem here with -O2, no problem with plain -O gcc flag. Thank you for helping. Do we blame the code or the compiler? -Current's system compiler is a snapshot: my CTM-updated /usr/bin/gcc -v shows 3.3.3 date 20031106. GNU's website shows 3.3.3 went GM in February 2004. We don't have an official 3.3.3 yet. On the ports side, my CTM-updated lang/gcc33 is a snapshot from earlier this month May 2004. I don't know what GNU's official status is; I imagine all their efforts were being put into 3.4.0 -- My CTM-updated lang/gcc34 shows it being a snapshot in mid-April 2004, but GNU's website says 3.4.0 went GM about a week later. We don't have an official 3.4.0 yet. I've just this minute finished proving a bug with -Current's system gcc: Compile x11/XFree86-4-libraries with -Os and you'll get an undefined compiler label .L91 in libXaw and -only- that lib, others are okay. Afterwards, anything that links with -lXaw stops portupgrade immediately with Error 1. Compiling the libs again (after cleaning) with -O2 and everything links properly (no .L91 problem). So far. I've just about convinced myself to once again try the lang/gcc* ports, but we need them to be caught-up to the Releases, as testing the snapshots left a bad taste/odor (I wrote about it quite a bit, should be in the maillist archives, including why I'm bent on using -Os ;) . If you can't trust your compiler, what _can_ you trust? > -- > Alex Dupre (BEfore anyone gripes about me cross-posting, I don't know which list should handle this, as our compiler problems are related to -Ports *and* -Current.) -- thx, Paul Seniura. -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm