From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 14 14:45:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A597B1065670 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from mail.skiltech.com (bunning.skiltech.com [65.36.251.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1C68FC1D for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.skiltech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCCC25BF1B for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:45:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at skiltech.com Received: from mail.skiltech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bunning.skiltech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9UljFKJ0h+YK for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-75-73-67-167.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [75.73.67.167]) by mail.skiltech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4B46425BF28 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4853D980.9030304@cwis.biz> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:45:20 -0500 From: Ryan Coleman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Testing RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:45:29 -0000 As you've probably read in my previous posts I'm having issues, most likely with the RAM. How would I go about slamming the RAM in testing? I was figuring I'd drop from 4GB to 1GB and just push the board with the same cp -rvn commands I've been running in an attempt to populate my 7TB RAID5. Also, am I using the wrong FS for the RAID? I partitioned it with gpt (1 large slice) and formatted it with newfs but is there another way? A better way? I read about ZFS recently but I am sure the speed of reading from a RAID5 is lost with it's redundancies. TIA, Ryan