From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 10 13:07:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A1316A4CE for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:07:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EE443D66 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:07:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from [194.192.25.143] (laptop.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.143]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8AD7cGJ049519; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:07:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <4141A6F0.7000009@DeepCore.dk> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:06:56 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frode Nordahl References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Promise PDC20267 ATA RAID, poor write performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:07:41 -0000 Frode Nordahl wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have a intel S845WD1-E board with onboard Promise PDC20267 controller= =2E > The system is set up with a P4 2Ghz with 1GB RAM. > The board also has a Intel ICH2, but that's only used by a CDROM. >=20 > Disks connected: > ad4: 39205MB [79656/16/63] at ata2-master UDM= A100 > ad6: 39205MB [79656/16/63] at ata3-master UDM= A100 >=20 > I have them set up in a RAID1 >=20 > I have tried this on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE, and 6-CURRENT (from today)=20 > with similar results. >=20 > I also tried with RAID0, and that showed the same results*2, that is,=20 > ca. 7MB/s write instead of 3.5MB/s. Hmm that is "somewhat" on the low side, even with those Maxtors it=20 should be better. I'll try to reproduce here, I should have semilar or even identical HW=20 in the ATA collection in the lab, give me a few days to get it setup... -S=F8ren