From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 29 08:09:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D371065676 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 08:09:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f159.google.com (mail-fx0-f159.google.com [209.85.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128648FC1C for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 08:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so1332761fxm.43 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 01:09:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=u3Wf0MjSSgBojbsq4KW/EyeGlou51kHHsOYMgJYaTd4=; b=B3ed4k8xCTobB+80bbDAGPCKo4F/lWj/LWrT0no3YgffDmdEdFIc8oQ7ccRr+Z3RJC uoqs8YWs05+dLKYNmR3R5jHZNTDaxQ5SxwosaLC2nH1VAl5bG4TxzgDiYBtE5e3bK4QS rufLBSu+19Hyrt5C4Snwo4s75Got06vxxWgTg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kuujPft4HVxS23L2yz5IPmvYYq+vHOZwBCD8vGQVZgdjQy/2V0ZsT4Sst4xfLxtQGT jBpOsNj+zHiKkqhd3HwbEQOVPhq6XPO4UowkobG2xHbEEyYEvvcpKtF61ZWg6kPzw6Fa D5RVJtZbponoteu7aRml8J05zyXIY/75gBgAE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.77.102 with SMTP id f38mr2114781bkk.65.1243584593144; Fri, 29 May 2009 01:09:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1F9F36FCD9644D4683DADAF7DD62B412@john> <200905272209.28550.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DE8DE@w2003s01.double-l.local> From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:09:33 +0100 Message-ID: To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johan Hendriks , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stable Mail Server And Web Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:09:54 -0000 2009/5/29 Wojciech Puchar : >>> >>> What i use is: >>> >>> sendmail - in base system+procmail from ports. procmail is mainly used to >>> store messages in maildir format. >>> spamassassin as antispam, someone already pointed that dspam is faster i >>> must check it. Anyway properly configured spamassassin isn't that bad. >>> >>> sqwebmail for webmail. it's highest performance and easiest to configure >>> webmail i've tested. It's fortunately not PHP based, it's written in C. >>> >> >> What's wrong with PHP? >> > 1) resource hungry > 2) quite buggy. While here can be discussed how much is because of PHP > itself, and how much of stupid-written PHP programs > I don't think PHP itself is buggy, in fact I think badly written C programs are responsible for far more lossage. Though you're right about resource-hunger. Chris -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list?