From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Dec  4 14:36:59 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA07158
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 14:36:59 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA07132
          ; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 14:36:53 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA07671; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 14:35:50 -0800
To: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
cc: time.cdrom.com!jkh@dg-rtp.dg.com, ponds!rivers@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU,
        freebsd-bugs@freefall.FreeBSD.org,
        freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org, jkh@freefall.FreeBSD.org,
        rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com
Subject: Re: Probable problem with SL/IP installations (ifconfig sl0 not run.) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 04 Dec 1995 11:13:10 EST."
             <199512041613.LAA01436@lakes> 
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 1995 14:35:50 -0800
Message-ID: <7668.818116550@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

>  Oh... I was confusing 2.1-STABLE with 2.1-RELEASE.   I suppose,
> at some time in the not too distant past, these two were the same
> (since RELEASE came from STABLE, right?)  But, I take it, STABLE
> has marched on.

No, I think you were looking in 2.2-CURRENT since the code in -STABLE
matches the release code, modulo a few fixes I made post 2.1.

					Jordan