From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 08:43:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C0216A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ran.psg.com (ip166.usw253.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.253.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D71143D5F for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:43:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1Ab0Tv-000Cur-Oc for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:43:03 -0800 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:43:03 -0800 To: FreeBSD Current Message-Id: Subject: 4.9-stable to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:43:09 -0000 i am running -stable on a thinkpad t40p. the thing won't resume (looks like ata interrupt loss), no ath driver, ... and i have time over the holidaze to try 5.x. two questions o can i just do the normal upgrade as described in UPDATING (cvsup, buildworld, kernel, installworld, ...) from 4.9 to 5.2RC in one leap? o is 5.2RC a good compromise choice? thanks randy