From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 24 16:49:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4912716A4E1; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3B543E64; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:47:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k9OGlGig074277; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:47:16 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k9OGlGqF074276; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:47:16 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:47:15 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20061024164715.GA74241@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Mikhail Teterin , current@FreeBSD.ORG, tjr@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200609202304.25537@aldan> <200610240749.11234@aldan> <20061024153523.GA73555@nagual.pp.ru> <200610241140.43389.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200610241140.43389.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, tjr@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: replacing FreeBSD's -lgnuregex with GNUlib's version X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:49:07 -0000 On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:40:43AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > в?второк 24 жовтень 2006 11:35, Andrey Chernov написав: > > The common bottle neck is locale: > > collating, multibyte and character classes handling. > > Is the currently used -lgnuregex passing these requirements? I remember some multibyte-related PRs assigned to tjr (inactive now?) No single byte locale problems found. > The proposed replacement is simply the newer version of the currently used Red > Hat -lgnuregex. > > I'd hate to go through the pain similar to that of the csh vs. tcsh debate... Well, go on and lets see what happens :) -- http://ache.pp.ru/