From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Jul 25 20:22:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA04750 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 20:22:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from newsguy.com (perry.co.pathlink.com [207.211.168.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA04721 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 20:22:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from reyesf@newsguy.com) Received: (from reyesf@localhost) by newsguy.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA15678; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 20:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199807260321.UAA15678@newsguy.com> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "Greg Lehey" Cc: "advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 23:21:08 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 95 (4.0.1111) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: http://www.opensource.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 26 Jul 1998 11:47:49 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: >Quite honestly, I don't see that the web page is that unbalanced. It >does mention Linux much more than FreeBSD, but there's a lot more >Linux out there, so that doesn't make it unbalanced. Since that first mail I looked at the site much more in detail. I also got the same feeling as Jordan that it is unbalanced and not because there is more Linux out there. I don't think he is purposedly doing it, just that he is not familiar with the BSDs. >I think probably the best thing we can suggest is a page on "Free >UNIX: your choice", with a summary (2 paragraphs or so) on each >flavour, and with plenty of links to follow up to. Comments? That would be a good start. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message