From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 17 00:30:44 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B215F2C;
 Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:30:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de)
Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20C42BE3;
 Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:30:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id
 r8H0UffE037900; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:30:41 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de)
Received: (from marius@localhost)
 by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r8H0UfMq037899;
 Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:30:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:30:41 +0200
From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
To: Olivier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cochard-Labb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking
Message-ID: <20130917003041.GA74198@alchemy.franken.de>
References: <520D4ADB.50209@FreeBSD.org> <5224511D.4090503@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130903134251.GB43281@caravan.chchile.org>
 <CAKYr3zwjQ9K1c5smZXTESa3T5UnchYaipYQCS2OAJOUFyPBGww@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+q+TcoeHDbkCOXvBjbbzOKCbb7RLYqG0jn9bHNn_CZgLGarLg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CA+q+TcoeHDbkCOXvBjbbzOKCbb7RLYqG0jn9bHNn_CZgLGarLg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org,
 Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD SCSI <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>,
 Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:30:44 -0000

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:48:38PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
> > theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
> > help further it.
> > Just checking to see how widely its been tested,
> 
> I've installed this patch on 3 differents machines there status after
> about 12hours:
> - SUN FIRE X4170 M2 (amd64: r255178) with 6 SAS harddrives in one big
> zraid (LSI MegaSAS Gen2 controller): Used for generating package with
> poudriere? no probleme since;
> - HAL/Fujitsu SPARC64-V (sparc64: r255178) with two SCSI-3 disks in
> gmirror: Used for generating package with poudriere too? no probleme
> since;

For testing GEOM direct dispatch on sparc64, please additionally use
the following patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_GET_STACK_USAGE.diff

Marius