From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 12:10:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5456616A4CE for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:10:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0899E43D48 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:10:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 35FE61C0009C for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:10:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1A7A21C00086 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:10:58 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050225121058108.1A7A21C00086@mwinf1102.wanadoo.fr Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:10:57 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <528192452.20050225131057@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <89b41e470502250015dc17b80@mail.gmail.com> References: <89b41e4705022407542f4feaa9@mail.gmail.com> <89b41e470502240834ba670b1@mail.gmail.com> <89b41e470502250015dc17b80@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:10:59 -0000 Daniel writes: > well, if a big company pays for support, those money would allow > FreeBSD to have some more people (developers or not) focus on giving > the support (fixing/answering) while the developers do their job...i > believe this is quite natural course of action Paying for support would rapidly generate a conflict of interest, in that it would encourage the production of buggy software in order to increase support revenues (the only revenues the software generates). -- Anthony