From owner-freebsd-security Wed Jul 18 8:52:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from stevie.loop.com (stevie.loop.com [207.211.60.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DD537B403 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:52:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwplists@loop.com) Received: from Elektra.loop.com (elektra.loop.com [207.211.60.33]) by stevie.loop.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA69607; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <039301c10fa1$c1e44b40$213cd3cf@loop.com> From: "D. W. Piper" To: Cc: References: <200105181518.WAA12362@bazooka.cs.ait.ac.th> <046c01c0dfc0$833e7fc0$213cd3cf@loop.com> <03a401c10efb$dd2eda60$213cd3cf@loop.com> <20010717223940.A437@blossom.cjclark.org> Subject: Re: Another question on IPFW Rule -1 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:53:09 -0700 Organization: The Loop Internet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Me: > > Is it significant that it's always "Fragment = 184"? (Is that the > > number of the fragment, or if not what does it mean?) From: "Crist J. Clark" > It's the offset. The data in the fragment should be placed at an > offset of 1472 bytes in the reassembled datagram. This is not a "bogus > frag" as described in the manpage. I think it's probably a runt > packet. Thank you for the response. Um... pardon my ignorance, but what do you mean by "runt packet"? Does what I've described suggest some kind of problem somewhere on our network, or on the other end? Or is it something that can be safely ignored? Thanks, David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message