From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 02:00:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF0DDF2F for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 02:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD148194B for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 02:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s45201KK072535 for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 02:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s45201fP072534; Mon, 5 May 2014 02:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 02:00:01 GMT Message-Id: <201405050200.s45201fP072534@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "C Hutchinson" Subject: Re: ports/188127: net/wackamole : deprecate Reply-To: "C Hutchinson" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 02:00:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/188127; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "C Hutchinson" To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, rene@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/188127: net/wackamole : deprecate Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 18:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Hello, I'm not sure why this was removed. The reason stated was made moot as of ports/188853 some 2 weeks ago. Is gnats broken? Is there any way to get the pr(1) system to find potential references before making a final call? After initiating ports/188853, I spent some time attempting to find related ports / pr's, and posted links to ports/188853. Apparently I missed this one. There must be a better way. --Chris