From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 16 23:40:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FC414D67 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 23:40:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA42151; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:40:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA36886; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:40:49 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908170640.AAA36886@harmony.village.org> To: Geoff Rehmet Subject: Re: Dropping connections without RST Cc: "'current@freebsd.org'" In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Aug 1999 10:26:00 +0200." References: Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:40:49 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Geoff Rehmet writes: : In default configuration, everything would behave as per : normal, and you would have to set a sysctl MIB before the : behaviour that I have described is displayed. : : Can anyone think of any reason why this feature should : not be implemented? How would this be different than a packet filter on inbound connections? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message