From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 18:07:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0505937B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk [129.215.144.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D244743F75 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:07:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk) Received: from sorley.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (sorley [129.215.144.53]) by rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA10849; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:07:37 +0100 (BST) Received: (from richard@localhost) by sorley.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id CAA13110; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:08:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:08:12 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200304070108.CAA13110@sorley.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> From: Richard Tobin To: Larry Rosenman , Richard Tobin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Larry Rosenman's message of Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:03:31 -0500 Organization: just say no Subject: Re: __stderrp problem after 4.8 binary upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 01:07:40 -0000 > > But as I said, I did a *binary* upgrade and selected all the compat > > packages. Do I have to do something with the sources *as well*??? > > Why? > There was an update later in the cycle. > > The 4.8 compat libs should have the right stuff. I'm sorry, I don't understand that. Later in the cycle than what? What should someone doing a binary update to 4.8-RELEASE do to make this work? -- Richard