From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 14 23:51:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB22710; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F051C20E2; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dommail.onthenet.com.au (dommail.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.70.57]) by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0932111E4C; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:51:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from Peter-Grehans-MacBook-Pro-2.local ([64.245.0.210]) by dommail.onthenet.com.au (MOS 4.2.4-GA) with ESMTP id BPE99540 (AUTH peterg@ptree32.com.au); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:51:28 +1000 Message-ID: <525C837E.7060302@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:51:26 -0700 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: Running bhyve on a AMD 1075T Phenom References: <5256D59A.20904@digiware.nl> <5256DD29.6090007@freebsd.org> <14A565E7-7D26-4C32-B73A-F5FAA16BC837@digiware.nl> <9A4BF6B0-91F1-43C5-B5D5-90486123336D@digiware.nl> <525738CE.9000708@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:51:31 -0000 Hi Craig, > There was a lot of non-trivial stuff done in the amd64 pmap code and the > BHyve intel module > for bhyve_npt_pmap, and these changes have not been made for the amd svm > code. Yes, that's right. > Does anyone have patches for the svm code? Not yet - Anish is working on it. later, Peter.