From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 20:37:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C125316A417 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from loki.netlab.sk (loki.netlab.sk [84.245.65.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A8313C459 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from lex.dino.sk (home.dino.sk [84.245.95.252]) (AUTH: PLAIN milan, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by loki.netlab.sk with esmtp; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:36:04 +0200 id 0002E022.46F97134.00013796 From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:35:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070917233555.GA74880@hades.panopticon> <200709250905.38470.freebsd-ports@dino.sk> <20070925202858.GA89037@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20070925202858.GA89037@hades.panopticon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709252235.45977.freebsd-ports@dino.sk> Cc: Dmitry Marakasov Subject: Re: Gnash 0.8.1 submitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:37:18 -0000 On Tuesday 25 September 2007 22:28:58 Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Milan Obuch (freebsd-ports@dino.sk) wrote: > > I was able to build gnash with konqueror plugin after applying following > > patch (warning, some linewrap is there): > > [patch skipped] > > > Trouble is, with gnash build this way I was not able to run X with KDE > > any more - with CPU at 100 % and xorg server process consuming 98 % CPU > > accoding to top I had basically locked console, even though I was able to > > login via ssh and get good response for non CPU intensive command entered > > in shell. If anybody have an idea, I can test it and report. Or maybe > > someone else could test it too... > > Does X/KDE start to consume CPU right after it starts? Which exactly > process does consume CPU? Does flipping options help (turn off media > handlers, switch renderer to AGG)? Does standlalone player with KDE > interface work (should be /usr/local/bin/kde-gnash)? Does GTK version cause > any bugs? See above - xorg server process (X itself) does consume almost all CPU. I need to try build a test instance - my working computer has too many konqueror windows and tabs open from the start so it is almost impossible to tell. What do you mean by flipping options? Changing build options when building the port? I can try it in my test instance a bit later. I did not do yet too much checks, but I definitely will, as soom as I have simple test instance running. Regards, Milan -- No need to mail me directly. Just reply to mailing list, please.