From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 26 13:36:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C2716A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47B7143D1F for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 25904 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Jun 2004 13:35:48 -0000 Received: from pD9FFD4EA.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO kiste.my.domain) (217.255.212.234) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 26 Jun 2004 15:35:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #443188 From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:35:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <34301.1088242340@critter.freebsd.dk> <200406261336.26051.alex@hightemplar.com> <20040626125907.5b5b3ae7.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20040626125907.5b5b3ae7.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_zuX3AkZBAvqgjvu"; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> cc: Alex Keahan Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:40 -0000 --Boundary-02=_zuX3AkZBAvqgjvu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:59, Miguel Mendez wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:25 +0300 > Alex Keahan wrote: > > Hi, > > > Is Solaris/x86 supported by ibcs2 or svr4? Solaris/x86 is being > > actively developed by Sun and is far from extinct. > > Solaris/x86 is a niche product. > [...] That's all very subjective arguments. The question is, does the binary comp= at=20 _work_ for any recent Solaris/x86 stuff? I rather doubt it, but haven't=20 checked, Scott seems to suggest it doesn't. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_zuX3AkZBAvqgjvu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA3XuzXhc68WspdLARAuZyAJ47uchd8S6NuxBUGMHwjU+4PvSIbwCfTOaQ uhUknOhDMZqTBIDZWczr6Rg= =5+s7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_zuX3AkZBAvqgjvu--