From owner-freebsd-chat Mon May 4 09:58:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA04812 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 09:58:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA04762 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 09:58:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA02847; Mon, 4 May 1998 11:58:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) Message-Id: <199805041658.LAA02847@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD will need threads for Apache 2.0 In-Reply-To: <199805041537.JAA05720@lariat.lariat.org> from Brett Glass at "May 4, 98 09:37:34 am" To: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass) Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 11:58:28 -0500 (EST) Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: "John S. Dyson" Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Brett Glass said: > According to the article at > > http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/news/0504/04apache.html > > version 2.0 will be threaded! This means that it'll have to emulate > threads if the OS doesn't provide them -- and this will probably > hurt performance. > > Guess that FreeBSD is likely to need threads.... A la Linux or > NeXTStep. > That is 100% going to be there (it has to be.) Part of my job is to help make sure that we have kernel threads. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message