From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 26 14:02:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9030516A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:02:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from robbins.dropbear.id.au (113.a.008.mel.iprimus.net.au [210.50.86.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E934243D31 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au) Received: by robbins.dropbear.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9DC864214; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:04:22 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:04:22 +1000 From: Tim Robbins To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20040626140422.GA10281@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <34301.1088242340@critter.freebsd.dk> <200406261336.26051.alex@hightemplar.com> <20040626125907.5b5b3ae7.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Alex Keahan Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:02:33 -0000 On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 03:35:40PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:59, Miguel Mendez wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:25 +0300 > > Alex Keahan wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > Is Solaris/x86 supported by ibcs2 or svr4? Solaris/x86 is being > > > actively developed by Sun and is far from extinct. > > > > Solaris/x86 is a niche product. > > [...] > > That's all very subjective arguments. The question is, does the binary compat > _work_ for any recent Solaris/x86 stuff? I rather doubt it, but haven't > checked, Scott seems to suggest it doesn't. Last time I checked, it was at least capable of running a "Hello World" program compiled on SunOS 5.8. I suspect it would be capable of running most programs that use only Standard C library routines, but I doubt something like Java would run -- it doesn't even work well under Linux emulation. Tim