From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 6 15:08:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409F516A4DA for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shadow@psoft.net) Received: from mail.sevcity.net (ns.sevcity.net [193.47.166.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD73A43D4C for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:08:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shadow@psoft.net) Received: from mail.sevcity.net (service.sevcity [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sevcity.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBD9170036; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:08:42 +0300 (EEST) Received: from berloga.shadowland (umka.sevcity.net [193.47.166.138]) by mail.sevcity.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64196170034; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:08:42 +0300 (EEST) Received: from berloga.shadowland (berloga.shadowland [127.0.0.1]) by berloga.shadowland (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k76F8b8f005542; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:08:37 +0300 Received: (from root@localhost) by berloga.shadowland (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id k76F8aLp005540; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:08:36 +0300 From: Alex Lyashkov To: Chris Jones In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Positive Software Message-Id: <1154876916.5303.7.camel@berloga.shadowland> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-17) Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 18:08:36 +0300 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Jail Memory Limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 15:08:39 -0000 I read you patch and see you start N kernel threads for control memory/CPU usage, when each thread in loop count total memory usage. What are reason why not create memory limit similar limit(1)? for this need add pointer to prison structure at each VMA struct and add few checks at same points when LIMIT_VMEM and LIMIT_RSS checks. > > I'm expecting patches for jail scheduling to be coming down the pipe > soon. > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- FreeVPS Developers Team http://www.freevps.com