From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 5 17:48:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FADB8A for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user.vdr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66CE8FC14 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 16so6764925obc.13 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:47:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/46CL47rZYJHcD3IYC6kmJnOPNaiagQgWh9GkLnVVNM=; b=1IbEmtJkRoMW1wc7+hoko/dWBqfRL92rv4pO5OHdt9IQ7UCib5VuVlm/DR16wbv29o N7xhoyaiSIR28cvTLA6sqEcIiuuE0CmS4lobw2iFlrIYtUMPefW+uaTLLDkTlGrkn6LB lATMmAl5YslFaiQ4HEJx3KJzJemUzf6rS/QMFnMfkngRrb6RnMvQ74SotDHsxSCN2B8n o50DI918vaxGlEcSsHBihbzMBQjU/cvLUA80LrvJePo9ZNAzCLHIHSgLW7x8OHgUu53F 33gzNL39KO3ZOcRiQ8FHVKm33jsR+kr06gDN9zOngL2wr6niUkZeuhzZwijEswmg1OwZ KFlQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.170.10 with SMTP id ai10mr15057273oec.72.1354729679510; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:47:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.110.138 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:47:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1354723094926-5766828.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1354723094926-5766828.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:47:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why 24/192kHz sound is not a solution. From: VDR User To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:48:00 -0000 On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Jakub Lach wrote: > While searching why I cannot play 24bit source > (snd_hda, [AO OSS] Can't set audio device /dev/dsp > to s24le output, trying s16le... Still don't know why > though.) > > I've found really interesting piece of article, well > researched and precise: > > http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html > > I'm sure developers know about it already, but nonetheless > I think it's good find and pleasurable read. I don't know that using the mailing list to post links to articles is appropriate, but 24/192 does matter when it comes to processing. As only a final output format, that article is completely correct but to completely disregard 24/192 is misleading because it does have benefit earlier in the production chain.