From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Mon Jan 18 15:34:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D14CA877AA for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184611BEB for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 159E2A877A9; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152DCA877A8 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD6AE1BEA for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u0IFYwrG003757 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:34:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198045] x11-toolkits/pango : Build tools hiding dependency issues Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:34:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:34:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D198045 John Hein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com --- Comment #6 from John Hein --- While there was an example for x11-toolkits/pango, the original bug report = was decidedly not specific to that port. It was more general. I'd wager that repurposing this bug to be just a pango one is not what the OP was intendin= g. I thing I am seeing that the response to the OP from an infrastructure poin= t of view is that the weakness is known, probably won't be fixed more generally = in ports/Mk (rather should be addressed on a port case-by-case basis) and has workarounds available via poudriere, portmaster, and the like (although the tools that use a sandbox can mask problems when the full installed ports tr= ee is not used to build the packages). The original "bug", however, doesn't fit well in bugzilla as opposed to a discussion forum such as ports@ - or if there is a proposed infrastructure = fix perhaps at reviews.freebsd.org. I think this bug should have been closed as "answered" or "no general fix immediately available" and new ones opened for the individual cases rather = than transforming it to a bug for one of the individual cases. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=