From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 14 10:10:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A7337B400 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 10:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pr-webmail-2.demon.net ([194.159.244.50] helo=web.mail.demon.net) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 177foL-000OiH-0Y; Tue, 14 May 2002 18:10:05 +0100 Received: from ubik.demon.co.uk ([194.70.246.1]) by web.mail.demon.net with http; Tue, 14 May 2002 18:10:05 +0100 From: amn@ubik.demon.co.uk To: "Alfred Perlstein" , dg@root.com Cc: "Terry Lambert" , "Matthew Dillon" , jamie@tridentmicrosystems.co.uk, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020514013150.GA1585@elvis.mu.org> Subject: Re: Broadcom BCM5701 Chipset problems Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 18:10:05 +0100 User-Agent: Demon-WebMail/2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG bright@mu.org wrote: > > I guess I incorrectly assumed that the card only had a problem with > falsely marking packets as bad, and not marking bad ones as good. That is the impression I was left with using hardware with some different Broadcom parts, (about a year ago). Possibly also connected with packets with an odd number of bytes or shorter than a certain length, my recollection is a little hazy which faults these triggered. ttfn, Tony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message