From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 20:01:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA97E1065694 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:01:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2548FC19 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id WAA13567; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:01:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1PDjWN-000Am4-Lq; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:01:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4CD1BF92.102@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:01:22 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Allen References: <68E248E0-8619-4859-BFFE-1B5F5ABBC51F@airwired.net> <36E416FC-2F45-40C8-A7EC-0E7FA3B603A4@airwired.net> In-Reply-To: <36E416FC-2F45-40C8-A7EC-0E7FA3B603A4@airwired.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sergey Kandaurov , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: Fatal trap 18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:01:54 -0000 on 03/11/2010 21:45 Dan Allen said the following: > > On 3 Nov 2010, at 2:18 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > >> + if (cpu_logical == 0) + cpu_logical = 1; /* >> XXX max_logical? */ cpu_cores /= cpu_logical; hyperthreading_cpus = >> cpu_logical; > > My machine contains an Intel Core Duo, not a Core 2 Duo. However, both > machines have 2 logical CPUs. Perhaps the bug is not handling a Core Duo > properly. > > I just sync'd with csup's date command as Jeremy suggested. It is building > right now. We'll see if a 2010.10.28.06.00.00 GMT system has the problem. I > doubt it does. I think this Intel logical CPU code business is probably the > culprit. I am quite sure of that. > It is hard to believe that I am the only one with a Core Duo machine finding > this problem! Yeah, true. But there could be something unusual about your setup. I mean these lines from your dmesg: > WARNING: Non-uniform processors. > WARNING: Using suboptimal topology. What I propose is that we try to find a resolution, because I suppose you can't stay at the last working revision forever. P.S. so will you be trying the patch I proposed? -- Andriy Gapon