From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 25 19:31:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE8BCCD for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a.painless.aa.net.uk (a.painless.aa.net.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:0:30::51bb:1e33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F87A107F for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 106.122.2.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.2.122.106] helo=chaos.bikerevolution.co.uk) by a.painless.aa.net.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WINj2-00067o-2x for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:31:34 +0000 Message-ID: <530CEF93.8000306@onetel.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:31:31 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster, pkg, virtualbox-ose References: <530CDDC9.7080509@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:31:37 -0000 On 25/02/2014 19:18, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > >> ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: >> portmaster emulators/virtualbox-ose >> >> ===>>> Exiting >> >> But restarting with >> # portmaster emulators/virtualbox-ose >> starts by cleaning for virtualbox then starts again. Have I >> misunderstood something? I checked the work directory before and after >> the cleaning step and nearly everything was deleted. >> >> It's building now and I think it has time to finish so there isn't an >> immediate problem but I would like to find answers to the above. > > Portmaster cleans a port before starting to build. That's the safe > thing to do, there is no good way to know why a work directory is still > there, and options may have changed. > > -C can be used to prevent portmaster from cleaning first. Thank you. Apologies for not reading the portmaster man page first, I used portmaster for the first time last night and have a hard deadline of tomorrow to finish the laptop so in a bit of a panic. I'll have a proper read asap. Chris