From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Nov 18 7:18:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A9337B479; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 07:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from grondar.za (grapevine.grondar.za [196.7.18.17]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAIFIIJ12462; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:18:18 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200011181518.eAIFIIJ12462@gratis.grondar.za> To: Mike Smith Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Monotonic" counter/register call - commit candidate. References: <200011181356.eAIDuHF04876@mass.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <200011181356.eAIDuHF04876@mass.osd.bsdi.com> ; from Mike Smith "Sat, 18 Nov 2000 05:56:17 PST." Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:18:15 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I really hate "jiffie" and would prefer using just get_cyclecount > > or even better get_counter. > > "get_counter" is hopelessly vague. get_cyclecount would be OK too. I > don't care. Pick a name and stop bloody arguing about it. *Sigh* get_cyclecount it shall be. No more bikeshedding on that issue, please. Apart from that, do I have green light? M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message