From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 11:25:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF0D16A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:25:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bis.bonn.org (f-1.bis.bonn.org [217.110.117.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6819043D41 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:25:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ap@bnc.net) X-BIS-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Received: from [194.39.192.125] (account bnc-mail@mailrelay.mailomat.net HELO bnc.net) by bis.bonn.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP-TLS id 302326; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:24:59 +0100 Received: by bnc.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2b2) with PIPE id 787146; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:24:59 +0100 Received: from [194.39.192.247] (account ap HELO [194.39.192.247]) by bnc.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP-TLS id 787139; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:24:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <41AC571E.2020503@jrv.org> References: <41AC571E.2020503@jrv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <7261A3E8-42C2-11D9-AC2A-000A95A0BB90@bnc.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Achim Patzner Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:24:49 +0100 To: "James R. Van Artsalen" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact info@mailomat.net for more information (colossus) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 routing IPFW FWD'd packets? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:25:06 -0000 > FreeBSD 5.3 may send IPFW FWD forwarded packets to a destination other > than the one specified in the FWD action. FreeBSD 5.2.1 works as > expected. I sent a PR on that one already... It cost me a few hundred local pearls for data routed in the wrong direction (--> no donations to the FreeBSD Foundation for the next few years). > Packets sent to the directly reachable net 192.168.254/8 (rule 64000) > seem to work. Is it possible that packets are somehow being routed > after being FWD'd by IPFW? The counters show that the rule is applied, too. Just the "fwd" part is not happening. Achim