From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 13 02:36:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA5837B401; Tue, 13 May 2003 02:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ED043F93; Tue, 13 May 2003 02:36:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h4D9aIkA023400; Tue, 13 May 2003 03:36:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 03:35:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030513.033535.35806616.imp@bsdimp.com> To: joe@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030513092408.GB1512@genius.tao.org.uk> References: <20030512154517.GA20109@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030512.223656.112615601.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030513092408.GB1512@genius.tao.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org cc: des@ofug.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 umass.4 src/sys/dev/usb umass.c usbdevs X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 09:36:21 -0000 In message: <20030513092408.GB1512@genius.tao.org.uk> Josef Karthauser writes: : On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:36:56PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > : > That really screws up the modules, at least it does for pccarddevs. I : > think that an unwise direction. : : I think that it's a wise direction, but it needs to be done properly. I've been kinda convinced of the former, but definitely convinvced of the latter... The way that mii was done wasn't quite proper and we need to clean that up while we're at it. See my outline to arch@ for some of the issues there. Warner