From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 31 08:39:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: www@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B83A29A; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [62.119.52.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD318FC0C; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.vnode.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D48EE3F07A; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:39:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vnode.se Received: from mail.vnode.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VLmiNrYTuIR3; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:39:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from jd.benders.se (jd.benders.se [212.247.52.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBA1AE3F079; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:39:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:38:58 +0100 From: Joel Dahl To: Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: combining docs@ and www@? Message-ID: <20121031083858.GF1092@jd.benders.se> References: <5090CD31.8010201@FreeBSD.org> <20121031.163434.1588854285324282842.hrs@allbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121031.163434.1588854285324282842.hrs@allbsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org, gabor@FreeBSD.org, www@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:39:14 -0000 On 31-10-2012 16:34, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Gabor Kovesdan wrote > in <5090CD31.8010201@FreeBSD.org>: > > ga> Em 31-10-2012 04:49, Eitan Adler escreveu: > ga> > Hey all, > ga> > > ga> > I'd like to propose combining www@ and docs@ into one mailing list > ga> > ga> Off: it's actually doc@ not docs@, which apparently seems to work. > ga> > ga> On: I support the idea. Probably it was thought earlier that a www@ list > ga> in itself was useful but in practice, it isn't that useful in itself. I > ga> also have one mail folder for the two and I use procmail to collect both > ga> of them there. > > I agree with merging the two into one. There was a similar opinion > at BSDCan, too. I also support this idea. -- Joel