From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 12:15:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95DB16A4CE for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:15:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7286343D1D for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:14:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040201201459.XTXT2432.lakemtao07.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:14:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 14:14:03 -0600 To: Mike Silbersack References: <200402010756.i117uiWm094818@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040201085037.GA15540@regency.nsu.ru> <20040201140055.C3097@odysseus.silby.com> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040201140055.C3097@odysseus.silby.com> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 cc: Alexey Dokuchaev cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_subr.c uipc_mbuf.cuipc_syscalls.c src/sys/sys uio.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:15:01 -0000 On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 14:02:11 -0600 (CST), Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> > Rewrite sendfile's header support so that headers are now sent in >> the first >> > packet along with data, instead of in their own packet. When >> serving files >> > of size (packetsize - headersize) or smaller, this will result in >> one less >> > packet crossing the network. Quick testing with thttpd and >> http_load has >> > shown a noticeable performance improvement in this case (350 vs 330 >> fetches >> > per second.) >> >> Good news to us thttpd users out there. :-) >> Thanks! >> >> ./danfe > > Heh, that reminds me... With the same test parameters, Apache2 gets a > whopping 220 fetches per second. Go thttpd! :) > > (Hopefully once we enable threading support in apache2 it will go > faster... hopefully.) Have one of you tried AppWeb[1] yet? I learned about it from the Slashdot[2] and it claimed that it outperforms Apache that can deliver about 3.5K pages per second on a Pentium-class system. [1] http://www.mbedthis.com [2] http://apache.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/27/2210229&mode=thread&tid=148&tid=185 Cheers, Mezz > Mike "Silby" Silbersack -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.