From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 29 10:14:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A148416A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:14:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC19043D3F
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:14:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andre@freebsd.org)
Received: (qmail 223 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 10:06:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.54])
          (envelope-sender <andre@freebsd.org>)
          by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <joost@jodocus.org>; 29 Nov 2004 10:06:30 -0000
Message-ID: <41AAF696.6ED81FBF@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:14:46 +0100
From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joost Bekkers <joost@jodocus.org>
References: <20041129100949.GA19560@bps.jodocus.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: (review request) ipfw and ipsec processing order for
	outgoingpackets
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:14:55 -0000

Joost Bekkers wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> A while ago there was a discussion about passing packet through pfil before
> they are processed by ipsec. I've posted a rough patch back then and I've
> finally had time to polish it.
> 
> Although the changes seem very invasive at first glance, the .o files created
> are identical as long as IPSEC_FILTERGIF is not defined. With FAST_IPSEC diff(1)
> will tell you otherwise, but that is due to changed linenumbers which are used
> as arguments in two places. I've checked for differences by disassembling (objdump -d)
> the .o files.
> 
> The attached patch is against 5.3R

Please post unified diffs.

> I'm running it myself with FAST_IPSEC. The combination of this patch and the kame
> ipsec could do with some more testing.

-- 
Andre