From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 09:04:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242561065671; Mon, 26 May 2008 09:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) Received: from itchy.rabson.org (unknown [IPv6:2002:50b1:e8f2:1::143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE5F8FC15; Mon, 26 May 2008 09:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:909f:1:21b:63ff:feb8:5abc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:909f:1:21b:63ff:feb8:5abc]) by itchy.rabson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E267A3F8F; Mon, 26 May 2008 10:04:13 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <3C07B635-67F6-4EAD-A10F-D5AA4365FFEF@rabson.org> From: Doug Rabson To: Bruce M. Simpson In-Reply-To: <4839F77C.60306@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 10:04:13 +0100 References: <200805252211.m4PMBgEU052231@repoman.freebsd.org> <4839E7A8.5050205@FreeBSD.org> <4839F77C.60306@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: Tony Finch , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist BSD.usr.dist src/include Makefile src/lib Makefile src/lib/libatm Makefile atm_addr.c cache_key.c ioctl_subr.c ip_addr.c ip_checksum.c libatm.h timer.c src/rescue/rescue Makefile src/sbin/atm Makefile ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 09:04:15 -0000 On 26 May 2008, at 00:34, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Tony Finch wrote: >> On Sun, 25 May 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: >> >>> ATM shows no signs of going away as a WAN access technology for >>> people in the >>> UK, although its use in the core outside of British Telecom is >>> being eroded by >>> newer technologies. >>> >> >> Doesn't BT's 21cn mean the death of ATM there too? >> > > The G.998.1 part of ADSL2+ still mandates ATM as the transport. > Given how BT tend to roll things it out I would speculate that they > are still using ATM after 21CN migration, although I have no data to > confirm this either way. > > PPPoA is not going away any time soon -- it's written into the ITU > specs for G.DMT-lite after all -- and there is a huge installed user > base for that technology. > > Whatever happens with 21CN is still going to take time to filter > down to the rest of the populace. Also, someone's going to have to > pay for it somehow. > > Of course the whole ruckus over ATM in ADSL with people in the first > place, was that it locked them into using vendor gear, effectively > denying people control over their own IP endpoint address, and > restricting the services they can use as a result. I recently was able to reclaim my IP endpoint address(es) using a cheap Netgear DM111P in PPPoE to PPPoA bridge mode. Works very nicely...