From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 19 15:22:24 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@www.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@www.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC61616A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@www.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:22:24 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu)
Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu [147.91.1.120])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2179343D45
	for <freebsd-questions@www.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:22:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu)
Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAJFMDuA028228; 
	Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:22:13 +0100
Received: from localhost (ggajic@localhost)
	by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id
	jAJFMDpZ028225; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:22:13 +0100
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:22:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Goran Gajic <ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu>
To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
In-Reply-To: <4464qowuna.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511191614460.27943@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511182054480.7238@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu>
	<4464qowuna.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-RCUB-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the RCUB if you have problem
	with mail
X-RCUB-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-RCUB-MailScanner-From: ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu
Cc: freebsd-questions@www.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sio0: more interrupt-level buffer overflows
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:22:25 -0000

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Lowell Gilbert wrote:

>
> Is there some reason you're using -9 instead of one of the signals
> recommended by the pppd(8) documentation?  I would expect SIGTERM, for
> example, to close a lot more cleanly than SIGKILL...
>

I have tried but it makes no difference. Also, for some reason connection
establishment:

/usr/sbin/pppd connect "/usr/bin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/pppscript"

won't work on first attempt:

Nov 19 16:14:39  pppd[593]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Nov 19 16:14:40  pppd[593]: Connect script failed
Nov 19 16:14:42  pppd[598]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Nov 19 16:14:43  pppd[598]: Connect script failed
Nov 19 16:14:45  pppd[603]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Nov 19 16:14:48  pppd[603]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cuad0


I didn't see this oddity under RELENG_5_2_1 RELENG_5_3 and RELENG_5_4 but 
only under  RELENG_6.0.


Regards,
gg.