From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 19 10:38:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.dti.ne.jp (smtp.dti.ne.jp [210.170.128.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4B31530A for ; Sun, 19 Sep 1999 10:38:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shigio@tamacom.com) Received: from choota.signet.or.jp (PPP57.tama-ap5.dti.ne.jp [210.170.192.75]) by smtp.dti.ne.jp (8.9.0/3.7W) with ESMTP id CAA20709; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 02:38:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from choota.signet.or.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by choota.signet.or.jp (8.8.8/) with ESMTP id CAA01028; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 02:28:48 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199909191728.CAA01028@tamacom.com> To: W Gerald Hicks Cc: Shigio Yamaguchi , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GNU GLOBAL In-reply-to: Message from W Gerald Hicks of "Sat, 18 Sep 1999 13:50:31 -0400." <199909181750.NAA03329@bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 02:28:48 +0900 From: Shigio Yamaguchi Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG W Gerald Hicks wrote: > imho, global (a fine software package) shouldn't have been in the > OS source tree anyway. To me, the proper place seems to be in the > ports collection along with many other development utilities. It seems that you misunderstand. Current GLOBAL(3.53 and earlier) is BSD-style licensed and it is true for ever. I agree with the plan to make a ports of GNU/GLOBAL in the future. But you need not remove BSD/GLOBAL from source tree. -- Shigio Yamaguchi - Tama Communications Corporation Mail: shigio@tamacom.com, WWW: http://www.tamacom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message