From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 21 18:24:19 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1604C80
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:24:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2EDABD6
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:24:18 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t5LIOIMW014119
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:24:18 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 200939] devel/jsoncpp: update to latest version
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:24:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: johan@stromnet.se
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-200939-13-76LkBvxFVt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-200939-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-200939-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:24:19 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200939

--- Comment #6 from johan@stromnet.se ---
Wouldn't that force quite a lot of ports to install clang (if
compiler:c++11-lib requires clang; I may have my facts wrong here)? If that is
the case, I'd probably go for 0.12 rather than 1.6...


With that said, I'm having a hard time arguing for/against it, as it wont
affect me (running 10.1 only). And since both of you are @freebsd.org people,
I'll leave it to you to decide out what the best solution for the overall
FreeBSD ports collection is.

Also, if someone else which to take over maintainership (now when quite a lot
of ports depends on this one), feel free to grab it!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.