From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 17 08:14:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1AA1065670; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBD08FC13; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi12 with SMTP id 12so1292298pxi.3 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:14:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SKQYsnl06FSDrtxukX6QWe5/1MFlE5cNPQwdhY2x3rk=; b=hODJy2TIseDMjOXLG6oPK7nzjlUyyIoE2CxDEJxH+8Gik/1zzPe6cIT/fjMFK8hR3g uywayR/TfTWYg3c/e+4ooKRwYzRYMpDUSaHpda0FSbKr02ymfgDNqur5wu6Rmlrd+eKI 4EByooHkxt2S8mRueKjJhwhzOyaliNFP33nYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=G2AnsQkoyvIZdJ/1uKNz8hrwm1VTR9fRa7VefpiLBBV9K5rukQCHuFbwxeLRCWft65 wXt7Z2InXxoJcwlbswh+aDGGaGuGwy+/mX5Ql7gRqGv340k7foCp8TAo+FSER7hP1lql GuHtQTBy4gm0WAUgrTgsM63lp5B4v/QutSJxI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.66.29 with SMTP id t29mr1465637wak.187.1261036181926; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:49:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200912170737.nBH7bhTA049857@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200912170737.nBH7bhTA049857@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:49:41 -0800 Message-ID: From: Xin LI To: linimon@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/141629: patch for "databases/memcached is broken on 8.0" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:14:12 -0000 I think we should also update memcached to a new version; by the way, I don't think the coverage stuff would buy us anything in non-debug mode, so perhaps it should be disabled for all cases. The only problem I have so far is that I didn't make memcached pass its test cases, which is the reason why I didn't committed the update. Cheers, -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net