From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Aug 9 07:07:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA14175 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 07:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA14151 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 07:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomcat1.tbe.com by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA22465 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Fri, 9 Aug 1996 07:06:33 -0700 Received: from [140.165.210.81] by tomcat1.tbe.com via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO) id JAA01932; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 09:04:55 -0500 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199608091255.IAA15685@ulc199.residence.gatech.edu> References: from David Kelly at "Aug 8, 96 05:10:03 pm" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 08:43:56 -0500 To: Kenneth Merry From: David Kelly Subject: Re: Are we still having an uptime contest? Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 7:55 AM -0500 8/9/96, Kenneth Merry wrote: > It gets a decent amount of traffic: > >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll >ed0 1500 00.40.05.11.4b.60 43334276 662 31919680 0 16228 >ed0 1500 199.77.162 ulc199 43334276 662 31919680 0 16228 I'd always thought I was *probably* on a sloppy net: ed0 1500 00.00.b4.23.d1.21 6777747 346 768083 0 15908 ed0 1500 140.165.210 PeeCee 6777747 346 768083 0 15908 My Ierrs and Coll numbers are higher than Kenneth's average. Maybe not as it looks like Kenneth's machine is the source of most of his net's traffic. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@tomcat1.tbe.com (wk), dkelly@hiwaay.net (hm) ====================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.