From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 29 14:58:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79D716A4CE; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:58:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-234.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06E243FE5; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:58:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 680FB66C8E; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:58:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:58:03 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20031129225803.GA10325@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200311281553.hASFrURT003309@siralan.org> <86fzg8scn5.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <20031129142508.GA46034@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <20031129212512.GB8768@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: eik@FreeBSD.org cc: Andreas Klemm cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 22:58:05 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :( > > Well, er, a number of us do essentially nothing BUT ports QA. >=20 > Do you actually review ports Makefiles? Not pre-review, but post-review, certainly. We also have an cluster of ~25 machines and a number of ports committers who spend their days detecting and fixing problems with the ports collection. Kris --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/ySR7Wry0BWjoQKURAoIdAKCM2x1LtBEBUu73crcsLvPkKp/htgCgiJWu VkUOZXKGr4EfRQjetNB1NJU= =5H3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--