From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 29 15:01:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 58E2E16A4CE; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1436E43FB1; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:01:29 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id E66035309; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:01:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id AFAC75308; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:01:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id 601BA33C7B; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:01:20 +0100 (CET)
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <200311281553.hASFrURT003309@siralan.org>
	<86fzg8scn5.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk>
	<20031129142508.GA46034@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org>
	<xzpvfp3dz28.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20031129212512.GB8768@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<xzpr7zqer5u.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20031129225803.GA10325@xor.obsecurity.org>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:01:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20031129225803.GA10325@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's
 message of "Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:58:03 -0800")
Message-ID: <xzpn0aeeq4f.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on 
	flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: ss
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
cc: Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.org>
cc: eik@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:01:30 -0000

Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > Do you actually review ports Makefiles?
> Not pre-review, but post-review, certainly.  We also have an cluster
> of ~25 machines and a number of ports committers who spend their days
> detecting and fixing problems with the ports collection.

Well, in that case I'll ammend my comment to "I wish our ports QA team
had more time and resources" :)

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no