From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 23 21:08:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5166316A419 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D2A13C4A3 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Message-ID: <471E62CB.3020902@intersonic.se> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:08:27 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071009) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rihad References: <471E3620.306@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <471E3620.306@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:08:51 -0000 rihad wrote: > How risky is it to start using 7.0-BETA1 in production, with the > intention of upgrading to release as soon as possible? Thanks. We've used 7-CURRENT since January on a couple of production boxes and had very few disasters, well, none, but a couple of issues. "Risky" is a relative term really, but if you ask me I'd say the "risk" is rather low. But: TEST FIRST! --per