From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 6 20:15:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2AF16A41F for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0157B43D62 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBC51A3C25; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 12:15:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 695A651432; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:15:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:15:09 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joshua Coombs Message-ID: <20051206201509.GA78043@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:15:11 -0000 --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:37:59AM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote: >=20 > "Igor Robul" wrote in message=20 > news:20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc... > >On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote: > >>#options ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS > >> > >>What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable? The idea of=20 > >>avoiding > >>memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on > >>which any little boost is significant. : ) > >http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL > > > >So you can't use FreeBSD-6.0 and greater on 80386 anymore. >=20 > Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to=20 > eliminate that issue. >=20 > What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets are=20 > considered stable or not. Yes. Kris --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDlfFNWry0BWjoQKURAh8jAKCjNPXrksmDQcjU9qbD5TywrmJC/wCfdN25 lmC83ReU8UikTtpnMioJqg0= =cJ0m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--