From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 28 08:50:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8F016A4C0 for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 08:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob.tdlc@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1A013C4CB for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 08:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob.tdlc@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1012426wxd for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 01:50:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IQzRUQJzCsARUcwFk4LHuRjhyAE/9bTkhXSPJChNoztmebROBY3/2IjKL4CQXdgWlj8qzZzZBqiE/wtGEqrLG/G90WF+9du/jaGcZUPtfkn499486xEeQchQJQZbqwYXTgifW4cl2c3qHn0TZlTaAc/g6Oq6Puc0BTXZcCLLrP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fAneJnNlFVOvlo4A4fdDa1PZSku3Wz1NS7lHkOTxF16KIVIv8HaHOwlyfMvT4ARGfxUxO6ouCEj9AjvdVo3h92yukGmU+Tml8BLjhkIqsJ916bXT4jfwi/w2qGaeTq7t/NJjM18zWYf1II4NzNjEB8gExWBOWS2qbqvheXXzMGA= Received: by 10.70.11.5 with SMTP id 5mr8066990wxk.1180342238424; Mon, 28 May 2007 01:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.51.14 with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 01:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:50:38 +0900 From: "Bob McDonald" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070521082403.GA51136@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070521082957.GA51334@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070521083759.GA51515@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error in upgrading xorg (no metaport installed) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 08:50:39 -0000 OK, I remade and installed the kernel and world, but I'm still left with the same dependency error I was left with before. I'm a bit baffled as to where to go from here. Bob On 5/22/07, Bob McDonald wrote: > I updated my ports tree, but it doesn't seem that anything related was > updated when I cvsupped so I think it was complete: > > Updating collection ports-all/cvs > Edit ports/deskutils/deskbar-applet/Makefile > Edit ports/deskutils/deskbar-applet/files/patch-deskbar_Utils.py > Edit ports/devel/desktop-file-utils/Makefile > Edit ports/devel/glib20/Makefile > Edit ports/devel/glib20/files/patch-glib_gutils.c > Edit ports/ftp/proftpd/Makefile > Finished successfully > > uname -v shows: > > FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Oct 20 18:39:35 JST 2006 > root@bender:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP > > So maybe it is that the base system is too old? I won't be able to > get to fixing that until this weekend (and probably not then either), > but it seems like maybe that is my best hpe at the moment? > > best regards, > > Bob McDonald > > On 5/21/07, Bob McDonald wrote: > > I looked in my environment and while I see that directory in my path, > > I don't see anything to direct X to be installed there. I've set my > > nightly cvsup/portsdb script to run while I'm headed home on the train > > so when I get home I should have freshly updated the ports tree (of > > course I was getting pkgdb errors so maybe that will get in the way?) > > > > Should I rerun the command that failed to see i fthe ports tree update > > worked or are there other steps I should follow now? > > > > thanks! > > > > Bob > > > > On 5/21/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 05:34:55PM +0900, Bob McDonald wrote: > > > > If that is the only other optiuon then I must have an incompletely > > > > updated prots tree, but that seems somewhat unlikely too. Might there > > > > be another file aside from /etc/make.conf that was configuring it to > > > > work that way? There was nothing like that in /etc/make.conf > > > > > > Possibly it could be set in your environment too. Try updating your > > > ports tree again though > > > > > > Kris > > > > > >