From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 12:59:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050F6B00BB5 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:1008:bcb:1:1:0:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7214813DE; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4 From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:59:06 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org> References: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:59:18 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >=20 > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: [=E2=80=A6] >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and = pkg-1.7.0: [=E2=80=A6] >> Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=3Dlog are not = indicating that behavior. >> But I might have missed something. >>=20 >> Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards, >=20 > pkg 1.7 is IO intensive that may explain. Ok, understood. JFTR: perl (24s), python27 (44s), and ruby (125s) take the longest time = to reinstall. > I plan to readd some improvements on this side before 1.8 Good to know, thanks for your feedback. Regards, Michael