From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 28 02:04:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA13129 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 02:04:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from feral-gw.feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA13124 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 02:04:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by feral-gw.feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA23630; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 02:04:06 -0800 Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 02:04:06 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-Sender: mjacob@feral-gw Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Peter Wemm cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: re: the fracas that was "violets in the snow in Perth Amboy" In-Reply-To: <199812280853.QAA63951@spinner.netplex.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I had no quibble with the direction being taken- insofar as I didn't have a strong opinion about the specifics. I don't in general use KLMs under *BSD and have not investigated KLDs to see if they would solve persistent device/filesystem/emulation naming/loading/binding issues (which is probably the only area I'd get excited about). So, as such, a "heads up" to me would have elicited a "thanks for letting me know" but not much else. But the principle of headsup was/is important. Even further, a "heads up" with a "pay attention and help if you can" is even better. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message