From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 15 00:24:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA08006 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usr04.primenet.com (tlambert@usr04.primenet.com [206.165.6.204]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA07997 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA17342; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:23:55 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199709150723.AAA17342@usr04.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Here's an interesting bug in our utmp handling. To: benedict@echonyc.com (Snob Art Genre) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 07:23:55 +0000 (GMT) Cc: syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Snob Art Genre" at Sep 15, 97 01:11:06 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Agree. Not only have I never used it, I've never even heard of anyone > using it. Ok, come to think of it, I have used it, but only because I was > amazed that I could. :-) I used it in order to avoid having to redial a machine I was already connected to. I also used it to set my utmp name because I hated modifying all the remote machines ".rhosts" files and using "rlogin -l othername". Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.