From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 22 14:39:20 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C078037B401 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:39:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mukappabeta.net (moghedien.mukappabeta.net [194.145.150.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D26043FBD for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:39:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mkb@mukappabeta.de) Received: by mukappabeta.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4754F3440B; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:39:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:39:11 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mdmfs /tmp and fstab on 5.0 Message-ID: <20030222223910.GF16534@moghedien.mukappabeta.net> References: <20030222024546.GD16534@moghedien.mukappabeta.net> <20030222214849.GE16534@moghedien.mukappabeta.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030222214849.GE16534@moghedien.mukappabeta.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote: >>ln -s mdmfs /sbin/mount_mfs > >Yes, that's a workaround I had in mind. >I can't see any problem there, if the mdmfs program is compatible >with mount_mfs. I mean, the manpage even explicitly says, "the mdmfs Ok, mdmfs is not fully compatible with mount_mfs, since you don't specify a swap device as parameter but, for example, /dev/md0. Other than that it seems to work ok, when called as mount_mfs via fstab (thru a symlink). I now have the following line in fstab: /dev/md0 /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,nosymfollow,-s256m 0 0 Is there any reason that softupdates is enabled on the md filesystem by default? Wouldn't async do the trick aswell? -- Matthias Buelow To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message