From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 3 06:22:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DDC16A400; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 06:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2777643D69; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 06:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k336MoCL033980; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:22:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k336Mo07033977; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:22:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:22:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <4430BD3B.9040802@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20060402232236.Q33976@ns1.feral.com> References: <000001c656e0$d6da1f80$0201a8c0@win2k> <4430BD3B.9040802@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, 'Ganbold' , mj@feral.com, mjacob@FreeBSD.org, 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: contigmalloc() lameness (Re: boot problem in HP Proliant ML370 G4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:22:51 -0000 On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Scott Long wrote: > Matthew Jacob wrote: > >> I must have missed something here. What's the problem that causes >> contigmalloc to be called here? If this is to do with > 4GB of memory, that >> was fixed in -CURRENT over a month ago. >> > > He's using 6.0-RELEASE. > A reason to allow an MFC ? :-)