From owner-freebsd-net Fri May 4 1:58:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from imo-d10.mx.aol.com (imo-d10.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E3F37B424 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 01:58:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from raviprasad20@netscape.net) Received: from raviprasad20@netscape.net by imo-d10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.10.) id n.52.2785ab (16241) for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 04:58:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.com (aimmail10.aim.aol.com [205.188.144.202]) by air-in03.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 May 2001 04:58:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 04:58:49 -0400 From: raviprasad20@netscape.net To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: daemon rtsol Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7D1E2D78.3A910939.9513E96F@netscape.net> X-Mailer: Franklin Webmailer 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, Sending router solicitations is implemented as a daemon. Can't this daemon be implemented as a part of the kernel itself & called by the timeout() periodically to send the solicitations. Whether such an implementation is possible? Whether such an implementation effects the performance of freeBSD ip6 stack as a whole. regards ravi prasad __________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message