From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 14 18:18:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: i386@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F12F16A502; Sun, 14 May 2006 18:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E64C43D45; Sun, 14 May 2006 18:18:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4EIIeYs033624; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:18:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id k4EIIeNt033623; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:18:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 11:18:40 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: FreeBSD Tinderbox Message-ID: <20060514181840.GJ20934@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Wolfskill , FreeBSD Tinderbox , current@freebsd.org, i386@freebsd.org, gnn@freebsd.org References: <20060514061911.034CD7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060514061911.034CD7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: gnn@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, i386@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 18:18:47 -0000 On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:19:10AM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > ... > ===> lnc (depend) > @ -> /src/sys > machine -> /src/sys/i386/include > make: don't know how to make if_lnc.c. Stop > *** Error code 2 >... I don't have much confidence that the below is actually "correct" (for any reasonable value of the term), but it allowed my laptop to build a CURRENT kernel for today: Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/freebsd/src/sys/modules/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.493 diff -u -u -r1.493 Makefile --- Makefile 12 May 2006 20:39:22 -0000 1.493 +++ Makefile 14 May 2006 17:29:23 -0000 @@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ ${_linsysfs} \ ${_linux} \ lmc \ - ${_lnc} \ lpt \ mac_biba \ mac_bsdextended \ @@ -359,7 +358,6 @@ _linprocfs= linprocfs _linsysfs= linsysfs _linux= linux -_lnc= lnc _mse= mse .if ${MK_NCP} != "no" _ncp= ncp @@ -467,7 +465,6 @@ _ips= ips _ipw= ipw _iwi= iwi -#_lnc= lnc _mly= mly _ndis= ndis _nve= nve Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org When reading advertising, recall that "up to" means "no more than." See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.