From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 17 21:37:48 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B329106566B
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:37:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B018FC17
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:37:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37])
	by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4HL0drq095117
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Tue, 17 May 2011 23:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9])
	by mail.cicely.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4HL0adF043762
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 17 May 2011 23:00:36 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p4HL0ZLv016023;
	Tue, 17 May 2011 23:00:35 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: (from ticso@localhost)
	by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id p4HL0YKQ016022;
	Tue, 17 May 2011 23:00:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 23:00:34 +0200
From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>
To: Greg Ansley <gja@ansley.com>
Message-ID: <20110517210034.GK7176@cicely7.cicely.de>
References: <4C531E13.1070008@ansley.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C531E13.1070008@ansley.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 7.0-STABLE i386
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: at91sam9260: Patches
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:37:48 -0000

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 02:46:43PM -0400, Greg Ansley wrote:
> The following diff on top of my previous diff  adds support for the 
> AT91SAM9260 chip and Atmel AT91SAM9260-EK Evaluation card.
> 
> Using config file SAM9G20EK you can boot on both the 9260 and 9G20 based 
> development cards with the same binary.

Are your changes already in current?
I'm asking because I have a test board using a 9G45 CPU, which has many
things in common with the 9G20.

-- 
B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.